Sunday, August 5, 2012

Why Social Security benefits should not be cut


Because 46 percent of older Americans have less than $10,000 when they die.

That's another way of saying that Social Security keeps half of our elderly population from being destitute.

According to a new MIT report,  a big proportion of older Americans has little in bank savings, stocks or bonds. MIT News notes that of the 46 percent with almost no assets,
Most rely almost totally on Social Security payments as their only formal means of support, according to the newly published study, co-authored by James Poterba of MIT, Steven Venti of Dartmouth College, and David A. Wise of Harvard University. 
That means many seniors have almost no independent ability to withstand financial shocks, such as expensive medical treatments that may not be covered by Medicare or Medicaid, or other unexpected, costly events.
The study also finds married couples do way better than single people:
...the study — one of the first to examine Americans’ end-of-life finances — also reveals a diversity of outcomes among senior citizens. Between 1993 and 2008, it found, unmarried older individuals had median wealth of about $165,000 roughly a year before they died — a figure that includes current and future Social Security income, job-related pension benefits, home equity and financial assets. In the same period, the median wealth for continuously married senior citizens, roughly a year before they died, was more than $600,000.
The comments over at Economist's View are pretty enlightening as well. Read them here.